Environment

Long-term impact of conventional and optimal contribution conservation methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain in local pig breeds

  • Ai HS, Fang XD, Yang B, Huang ZY, Chen H, Mao LK et al. (2015) Adaptation and possible progression among ancient species in pigs identified by whole genome sequencing. Nat Genet 47:217–+

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Allendorf FW (1986) Gene drift and loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol 5: 181-190

    Google Scholar

  • Ayala FJ, Kiger JA (1984) Modern genetics. Benjamin’s Pub / Cummings. a company

  • Ayala FJ, Powell JR, Tracey ML, Mourao CA, Perez-Salas S (1972) Enzyme variation in a Drosophila willistoni group. Fourthly. Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila Willistony. Genetics 70: 113 – 139

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Berg P, Nielsen J, Sørensen MK (2006) EVA: Recognizing and predicting optimal genetic contributions. Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, August 13-18, 2006: Instituto Prociência. 27-09

  • Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variation. Am Nat 105: 201– +

    Google Scholar

  • Chen J, Peng J, Xiao Q, Pan Y, Zhang X, Lo LJ et al. (2018) The genetic diversity and population structures of indigenous pig breeds in Zhejiang Province were revealed by GGRS sequencing. Anim Genet 49:36-42

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Dagnachew BS, Meuwissen TH (2016) A fast iterative Newton-Raphson-based algorithm for optimum contribution selection at a large scale. Gene Cell Evol 48:70

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Dekkers JCM (2007) Predicting the response to marker-assisted genetic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 124: 331–341

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Ibrahimi A, Fathi R, Zamani Z (2011) Analysis of genetic diversity among some genotypes of the Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) using morphological features and markers of SSRs. Sci Hortic-Amst 130: 146-151

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Gomez-Romano F, Villanueva B, Fernandez J, Woolliams JA, Pong-Wong R (2016) Use of genetic uniformity matrices in optimizing contributions to maintaining genetic diversity in specific regions of the genome. Genet Select Evolut 48: 5613862

    Google Scholar

  • Gourdine JL, Sorensen AC, Rydhmer L (2012) There is scope for selection in a small domestic pig breed when optimum contribution selection is used: a simulation study. J Anim Sci 90: 76–84

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H, Toro MA, Scherf B, Pilling D et al. (2010) Genetic diversity in farm animals–a review. Anim Genet 41 (Supplement 1): 6-31

    PubMed Google Scholar

  • Grundy B, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (1998) Dynamic selection procedures for restricted inbreeding and its consequences for pedigree development. Genetic Precision 72: 159–168

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Hayes B, Goddard ME (2001) Distribution of gene effects affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Gene identification Evolut 33: 209 – 229

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Hayes BJ, Lewin HA, Goddard ME (2013) The future of livestock farming: genetic selection for efficiency, emissions intensity reduction, and adaptation. Genet Trends 29: 206-214

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Henderson CR (1976) A simple method for calculating the inverse numerator relationship matrix used in predicting breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69-83

    Google Scholar

  • Henryon M, Liu H, Berg P, Su G, Nielsen HM, Gebregiwergis GT et al. (2019) Ancestral relationships to control inbreeding in choosing the optimal contribution yield more genetic gains than genetic relationships. Gene Cell Evol 51:39

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Kaljund K, Jaaska V (2010) No loss of genetic diversity in small and isolated populations of Medicago sativa subsp falcata. Biochem Syst Ecol 38: 510-520

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Liu H, Henryon M, Sorensen AC (2017) Mating strategies with genomic information reduce inbreeding rates in animal husbandry schemes without compromising genetic gains. Animal 11:547-555

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Marsden CD, Ortega del Vecchio D, O’Brien DB, Taylor JF, Ramirez O, Villa C et al. (2016) Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variance in dogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 152-157

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Meuwissen TH (1997) Maximizing the selection response at a predetermined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75: 934-940

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Meuwissen THE, Sonesson AK, Gebregiwergis G, Woolliams JA (2020) Managing genetic diversity in the age of genomics. Forward gene 11:880

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of genetic diversity in divided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3321-3323

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Oldenbroek J (2017) Genomic management of animal genetic diversity. Wageningen Academic Publishers.

  • Pekkala N, Knott KE, Kotiaho JS, Nissinen K, Puurtinen M (2014) Effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterogeneity on a set of inbreeding coefficients. Evol Apple 7: 1107-1119

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Qian W, Ge S, Hong DY (2001) Genetic variation within and between groups of wild rice Oryza granulata from China detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor App Genet 102: 440-449

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Sanchez-Molano E, Pong-Wong R, Banos G (2016) Optimal genome-based contribution to genetic conservation and improvement programs with antagonistic fitness and productivity traits. Front gene 7:25

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS (2009) QMSim: a large-scale livestock genome simulator. Bioinformatics 25: 680 – 681

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Shapira R, David L (2016) Genes with a combination of dominant and epistatic influences underlie heterogeneity in the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high temperature. Frontal Gene 7:72

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Smith C (1984) Genetic aspects of conservation in farm animals. Livest Prod Sci 11:37-48

    Google Scholar

  • Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE (2000) Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet Choice Evolutn 32: 231–248

    Google Scholar CAS

  • Thomasen JR, Willam A, Egger-Danner C, Sorensen AC (2016) Reproductive techniques combine well with genetic selection in dairy breeding programmes. J Dairy Sci 99: 1331-1340

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Vanavermaete D, Fostier J, Maenhout S, De Baets B (2020) Conserving genetic diversity in a breeding population for long-term genetic gain G3 10:2753–2762

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Villanueva B, Fernandez A, Saura M, Caballero A, Fernandez J, Morales-Gonzalez E et al. (2021) The value of genomic relationship matrices to estimate levels of inbreeding. Gene Cell Evol 53:42

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Wang Y, Bennewitz J, Wellmann R (2017) New optimal contribution selection methods that take into account conflicting goals in livestock breeding programs with historical migration. Gene Cell Evol 49:45

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Wellmann R (2019) Choosing the optimum contribution to animal husbandry and conservation: the optiSl R package BMC Bioinform 20:25

    Google Scholar

  • Wellmann R, Hartwig S, Bennewitz J (2012) Choosing the optimal contribution to a protected population with historical migration. Gene Cell Evol 44:34

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Woolliams JA, Berg P, Dagnachew BS, Meuwissen THE (2015) Genetic contributions and their improvement. J Anim Breed Genet 132: 89-99

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Yang H (2013) Livestock Development in China: Livestock Production, Consumption and Genetic Resources. J Anim Breed Genet 130: 249-251

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Yang JA, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR et al. (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of heritability in relation to human height. Nat Genet 42:565–131

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Zeng ZB, Hill WG (1986) Limit of selection due to inconsistency between truncation and stabilization of selection with mutation. Genetics 114: 1313-1328

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Zhao QB, Lopez-Cortegano E, Oyelami FO, Zhang Z, Ma PP, Wang QS et al (2021) Conservation priority analysis of indigenous Chinese pig breeds in the Taihu Lake area. Anterior gene 12: 558873

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Zhao QB, Sun H, Zhang Z, Xu Z, Olasege BS, Ma PP et al. (2019) Exploring the structure of haplotype blocks and genetic diversity in indigenous Chinese pig populations for the purpose of conservation. Evol Bioinform Online 15: 1176934318825082

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Related posts
    Environment

    Stop Pacheco Dam Coalition Reveals Alarming Economic and Environmental Consequences of the New Pacheco Dam Project

    San Jose, California – (work wire) – The Pacheco Dam Endowment Coalition has won the…
    Read more
    Environment

    New Mexicans testify to EPA for stronger air pollution controls

    Restricting methane emissions from oil and gas operators was necessary to tackle climate change…
    Read more
    Environment

    EPA worried about SC nuclear fuel plant, urges more study

    One of the country’s only nuclear fuel plants is located in eastern Richland County. The…
    Read more
    Newsletter
    Become a Trendsetter
    Sign up for Davenport’s Daily Digest and get the best of Davenport, tailored for you.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *