Musk Drops ‘Twitter Files 2.0’, Reveals Top Conservative Figures ‘Blacklisted’ – zoohousenews.com

(Natural News) A second massive drop in internal Twitter communications reveals further evidence that the platform, under old leadership, was a tool of the far-left authoritarian Deep State armed against right-wing conservative viewpoints.

The Twitter Files 2.0 drop was revealed by another investigative journalist, Bari Weiss, while last week’s dump was posted by journalist Matt Taibbi after receiving the information from platform boss Elon Musk.

“Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status so you’ll know exactly if you’ve been banned, why and how to appeal,” Musk tweeted ahead of the data dump.

He also said that in the near future Twitter will “begin to unblock the namespace of 1.5 billion accounts,” further noting, “These are apparent account deletions with no tweets and no sign-up for years.”

These are apparent account deletions with no tweets and no signup for years

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022

“Twitter’s mission was to ‘give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.’ However, barriers were erected along the way,” Weiss wrote. She referred to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, a longtime opponent of COVID groupthink during the pandemic, who has spoken out against lockdowns.

“Twitter secretly put him on a ‘trends blacklist,’ which prevented his tweets from being trended,” Weiss continued, further reporting that Fox News anchor Dan Bongino was “search blacklisted” and Turning’s Charlie Kirk Point USA to “Do Not Reinforce.”

“A new #TwitterFiles investigation shows teams of Twitter employees create blacklists, prevent unwanted tweets from trending, and actively restrict the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics — all in secret without informing users.” , Weiss started her thread on Thursday.

1. A new one #TwitterFiles Research has found that teams of Twitter employees create blacklists, prevent unwanted tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics — all in secret without informing users.

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

2. Twitter once had the mission of “giving everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly without barriers”. Barriers were nevertheless erected along the way.

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

3. Take Dr. Jay Bhattacharya from Stanford (@DrJBhattacharya), who argued that Covid lockdowns were harming children. Twitter secretly put him on a “trends blacklist” that prevented his tweets from trending. pic.twitter.com/qTW22Zh691

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

4. Or consider popular right-wing talk show host Dan Bongino (@dbongino), which was eventually hit with a “Search Blacklist”. pic.twitter.com/AdOK8xLu9v

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

5. Twitter suspended the account of conservative activist Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) to “Do not reinforce”. pic.twitter.com/dOyQIVdsW2

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

“Twitter denied doing such things. In 2018, Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said, “We’re not shadowing the ban.” They added, ‘And we’re certainly not shadowing the ban on the basis of political Points of view or ideologies,'” Weiss continued the thread.

These were obviously blatant lies.

6. Twitter denied doing such things. In 2018, Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said, “We’re not shadowing the ban.” They added, “And we’re certainly not shadowing the ban on the basis of political.” Viewpoints or ideologies.”

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022

She went on to say that the platform’s left managers did what the left always does – they simply changed the language to justify their lie.

“What many people call ‘shadow ban’, Twitter executives and staff call ‘visibility filtering’ or ‘VF’. Several high-level sources have confirmed its importance,” she said — which is a shadow ban.

If there could be any charges against former Twitter executives for what appeared to be obvious fraudulent practices, they should.

Sources include:

Revolver.news

ConservativeBrief.com